NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85890 versus 55399
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 versus 182.11
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3403.106 versus 1797.792
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 versus 14.071
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.919 versus 26.444
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 16128
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3638
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 16128
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3638
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 versus 6814
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 2 November 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85890 versus 55399 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 versus 182.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 versus 1797.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 versus 14.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 versus 26.444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 versus 6814 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 6% de pipelines plus haut: 2432 versus 2304
- 4.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 versus 1010.818
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2432 versus 2304 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 versus 1010.818 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85890 | 55399 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 182.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 1797.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 14.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 26.444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 1035.984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 6814 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14693 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 874 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP104 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 2 November 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 206 | 243 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDFirePro W9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
