NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 785.1x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 162.5x more memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 10 GB/s
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 55548
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 150.103
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 2036.763
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 14.035
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 27.417
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 819.934
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 20151 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3714
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3359
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3714
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3359
- 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 vs 1873
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 vs 1873 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 7209 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $499.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 211 | 254 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
