NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 283.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 162.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 55548
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 150.103
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 2036.763
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 14.035
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 27.417
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 819.934
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 15 August 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 20151 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3714
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3359
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3714
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3359
- 3.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 versus 1873
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 versus 1873 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 7209 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP104 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $499.99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 254 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 10 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
