NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41323 vs 32981
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 421
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 6598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41323 vs 32981 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 421 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 vs 6598 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7682
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7682
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41323 | 32981 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 421 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 | 6598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 381 | 391 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300M
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A370M
