NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • 4.7x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7160 vs 4979
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 371
  • Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 22838
  • 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 1715
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1177
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1724
  • 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 1715
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1177
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1724
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7160 vs 4979
PassMark - G2D Mark 452 vs 371
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 22838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7160
4979
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
452
371
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
22838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
1724
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
1724
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
PassMark - G3D Mark 7160 4979
PassMark - G2D Mark 452 371
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 22838
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 1724
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 102.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1762.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 617.099

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU117 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 27 June 2017
Place in performance rating 368 682
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1500 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 1704 MHz
Memory type GDDR5