NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7160 vs 4979
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 371
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 22838
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 1715
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1177
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1724
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 1715
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1177
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7160 vs 4979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 vs 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 22838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7160 | 4979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 22838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1724 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 682 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1704 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 |