NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

AMD Radeon R7 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 83% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 975 MHz
1830.1x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 110 Watt
8.2x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7160 vs 4519
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 7102
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 7102
2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 1499

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7160 vs 4519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 7102
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 1499

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 452
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 38863

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	605 vs 452
Geekbench - OpenCL	86561 vs 38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7160

4519

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

452

605

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

86561

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3359

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

1499

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R7 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	7160	4519
PassMark - G2D Mark	452	605
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	86561
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	1499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		359.237

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R7 370
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Trinidad
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	368	407
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	975 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1024
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	62.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	110 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	2,800 million
Floating-point performance		1,997 gflops
Stream Processors		1024
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		152 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	975 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)