NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 3965.3x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 1237
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 299
• 8.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 4657
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3309
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3309
• 48.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 68

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7235 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	430 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	38863 4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3319 68

Compare specifications (specs)