NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1152 MHz
Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1417 MHz
1678.9x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 5320
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 345
Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 19914
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8059
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3579
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8059
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3579
Around 50% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 2219

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 3 January 2018
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1152 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1417 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235 vs 5320
PassMark - G2D Mark	430 vs 345
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 19914
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3579
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 2219

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7235

5320

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

345

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

19914

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8059

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3579

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8059

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3579

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3358

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

2219

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235	5320
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	345
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	19914
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	2219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		293.638

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP107
Launch date	27 May 2019	3 January 2018
Place in performance rating	362	505
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1417 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1152 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	768
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	68.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	3,300 million
Floating-point performance		2,177 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready