NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1040.1x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7160 vs 5427
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3627
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3627
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7160 vs 5427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3627 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 453
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7160 | 5427 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 | 694 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 369 | 306 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A570M
