NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1098 MHz
2600.2x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 3446
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 336
4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 8148
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 4920
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 4920

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 3 December 2015
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1029 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235 vs 3446
PassMark - G2D Mark	430 vs 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 8148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 4920

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 60 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7235

3446

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

336

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

8148

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3355

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235	3446
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	336
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	8148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		172.896

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Code name	TU117	GM107
Launch date	27 May 2019	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	362	700
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	640
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,405 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus