NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9962 vs 9313
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56963 vs 48365
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 10296
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 10296
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 vs 9313 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56963 vs 48365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 476
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9962 | 9313 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 687 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56963 | 48365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Navi 12 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 271 |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 65.92 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 164.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | |
| Compute units | 40 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 394.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
