NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1080 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)

Boost clock speed	1815 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Around 27% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 735 MHz
Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 95 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13637 vs 9765
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 612 vs 493
Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 80223 vs 56688
Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 12750
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3708
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3355
Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 12750
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3708
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3355

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	930 MHz vs 735 MHz
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 W vs 95 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	13637 vs 9765
PassMark - G2D Mark	612 vs 493
Geekbench - OpenCL	80223 vs 56688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20002 vs 12750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	10384 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10130 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20002 vs 12750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	10384 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10130 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9765

13637

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

493

612

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

56688

80223

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12750

20002

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

10384

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

10130

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12750

20002

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

10384

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

10130

Name	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	9765	13637
PassMark - G2D Mark	493	612
Geekbench - OpenCL	56688	80223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	202.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2138.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	151.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	729.947
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12750	20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12750	20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	10130
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		7412

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Code name	GA106	TU104B
Place in performance rating	272	107
Launch date		2 Apr 2020
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1815 MHz	1080 MHz
Core clock speed	735 MHz	930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	145.2 GFLOPS (1:64)	172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	9.293 TFLOPS (1:1)	11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	9.293 TFLOPS	5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2560
Pixel fill rate	87.12 GPixel/s	69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	145.2 GTexel/s	172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	80 W
Transistor count	13250 million	13600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width		IGP
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6