NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 9765
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 493
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 56688
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 12750
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 vs 9765 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 vs 493 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 vs 56688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 10967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 498 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 63532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | N19E-Q1 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 249 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 198.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.72 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 6.359 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 10800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
