NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1785 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 vs 7235
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 493 vs 430
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56688 vs 38863
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 9313
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 9313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1785 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 vs 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 vs 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 vs 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 38863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU117 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 362 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
