NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• 6817x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• 11.5x more pipelines: 5888 vs 512
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 3670
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 549
• 9.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 12475
• 10.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 43.877
• 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 773.248
• 13.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 3.082
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 53.425
• 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 184.343
• 8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 3575
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3881
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 6631
• 8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 3575
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3881
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 6631

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 220 Watt
• 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22253 3670
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 549
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	123479 12475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	453.922 43.877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5803.174 773.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.757 3.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.055 53.425
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1664.554 184.343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 6631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 6631

Compare specifications (specs)