NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 802.4x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 2x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• 2x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1651
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 435
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 3053
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 19.856
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 309.824
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.38
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 25.011
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 84.489
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2709
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2875
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2709
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2875

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 117

Compare specifications (specs)