AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 versus AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon RX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 60-80 Watt
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 60-80 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090-1175 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200-1275 MHz versus 1082 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 34.62 GTexel/s
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3646 versus 2428
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 494 versus 444
- 4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 versus 14535
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 versus 25.896
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 775.281 versus 486.804
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.602 versus 2.503
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 versus 53.111
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 versus 100.658
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 versus 2524
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 3274
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 versus 2524
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 3274
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz versus 1082 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 34.62 GTexel/s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3646 versus 2428 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 494 versus 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 versus 14535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 versus 25.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 versus 486.804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 versus 2.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 versus 53.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 versus 100.658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 versus 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 3274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 versus 2524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 3274 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | 3646 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 494 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | 57671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | 56.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | 775.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | 4.602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 64.428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | 257.062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 | 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1803 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Polaris 21 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 812 | 522 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $104.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1082 MHz | 1200-1275 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 10 | 14/16 |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
Stream Processors | 640 | 896/1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.62 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2200 million | 3,000 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | Half Height | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 6.6" (168 mm) | 170 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |