AMD Radeon R7 250X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 250X and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 38 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 192
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,216 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 106 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 versus 1322
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 versus 310
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.22 versus 14.758
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.532 versus 302.509
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.963 versus 0.965
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.987 versus 14.925
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.963 versus 27.656
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3916 versus 2160
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3365
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3325
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3916 versus 2160
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3365
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3325
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2014 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,216 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 versus 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 versus 310 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 versus 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 versus 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 versus 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1625 MHz
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1625 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 250X | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 | 310 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 250X | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | GF106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2014 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 659 | 1130 |
Prix maintenant | $260.70 | $64.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.25 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,216 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 210 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s | 57.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |