AMD Radeon R9 370X versus AMD FirePro W7000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD FirePro W7000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 76 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 2,432 gflops
- Environ 94% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 52.467
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 versus 4.886
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 85.472
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 268.49
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 6475
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 6475
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 versus 13 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 950 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 76 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 2,432 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 52.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 versus 4.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 85.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 268.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 6475 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7000
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1148.367 versus 1139.703
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 versus 1139.703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 52.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1148.367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 4.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 85.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 268.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4279 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 543 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18150 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $899 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 516 | 497 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 242 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 370X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
ATIRadeon X1300 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
