AMD Radeon RX 590 versus AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.48 GTexel/s versus 224.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 16x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 132.701
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 versus 10116
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 versus 10116
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 10 July 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s versus 224.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 132.701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 versus 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 versus 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4762 versus 4739 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- 1009.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 7,168 gflops versus 7.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9592 versus 9464
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53724 versus 46611
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 140.274 versus 137.469
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 versus 2083.862
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.082 versus 12.352
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 789.536 versus 762.142
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 7,168 gflops versus 7.1 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9592 versus 9464 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53724 versus 46611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 versus 137.469 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 versus 2083.862 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 versus 12.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 versus 762.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9464 | 9592 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 46611 | 53724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 140.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 3595.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 13.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 132.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 789.536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4762 | 4739 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 30 | Fiji |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series |
| Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 10 July 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $549 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 260 | 277 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $399.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | 56 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | 7,168 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | 3584 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 8,900 million |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 590 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 590 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 590 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 590 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
AMDRadeon RX 590 vs
NVIDIATesla T4
AMDRadeon RX 590 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500
AMDRadeon RX 590 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
