Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 versus 36.256
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 16 August 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 versus 36.256 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 915 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 28x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 48
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4407 versus 1739
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 versus 363
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15191 versus 7351
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 versus 465.116
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.001 versus 2.796
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 versus 29.115
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 versus 54.932
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 versus 2780
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 1884
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 versus 2780
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 1884
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1616 versus 619
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 48 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 versus 1739 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 versus 363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15191 versus 7351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 versus 465.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.001 versus 2.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 versus 29.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 versus 54.932 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 versus 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 versus 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 1884 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 versus 619 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 | 4407 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 461 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7351 | 15191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | 3.001 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 1616 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT3e | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 16 August 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1044 | 736 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Prix maintenant | $321.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1344 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |