Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 versus 2664
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 versus 2664
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3626
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3626
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3318
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3318
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 28 June 2011 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 versus 2664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 versus 2664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3318 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 620 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 6x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 64
| Vitesse du noyau | 620 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 64 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 2664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 2664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3318 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3318 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2074 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6389 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.702 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.215 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 28 June 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 670 | 920 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 952.3 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.7 billion / sec | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) avec des autres
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
