NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 35 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt versus 35 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Environ 83% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.8 billion / sec versus 5.9 billion / sec
2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.05 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 900 MHz versus 800 MHz
Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 versus 286
Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 91 versus 77
Environ 65% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2171 versus 1313
Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 versus 3.237
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 versus 83.376
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 versus 0.26
Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 versus 5.92
3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 versus 4.992
Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 versus 536
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1731
Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 versus 2380
Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 versus 536
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1731
Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 versus 2380

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	10.8 billion / sec versus 5.9 billion / sec
Pipelines	96 versus 48
Performance á point flottant	258.05 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	900 MHz versus 800 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	478 versus 286
PassMark - G2D Mark	91 versus 77
Geekbench - OpenCL	2171 versus 1313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.85 versus 3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	195.796 versus 83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.561 versus 0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.109 versus 5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.727 versus 4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	960 versus 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2210 versus 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2701 versus 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	960 versus 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2210 versus 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2701 versus 2380

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

286

478

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

2171

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.237

4.85

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

83.376

195.796

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.26

0.561

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.92

9.109

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.992

16.727

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

536

960

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1731

2210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2380

2701

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

536

960

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1731

2210

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2380

2701

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark	286	478
PassMark - G2D Mark	77	91
Geekbench - OpenCL	1313	2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.237	4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	83.376	195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.26	0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.92	9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	4.992	16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	536	960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1731	2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2380	2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	536	960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1731	2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2380	2701
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Essentiel
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Nom de code	GF108	GF108
Date de sortie	5 January 2011	5 January 2011
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$59.99
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1558	1503
Prix maintenant	$59.99
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	7.54
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	672 MHz	672 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	48	96
Performance á point flottant	129.02 gflops	258.05 gflops
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	96
Taux de remplissage de la texture	5.9 billion / sec	10.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt	35 Watt
Compte de transistor	585 million	585 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	12 API	12 API
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	12.8 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	800 MHz	900 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
DirectCompute
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
DirectX 11		DirectX 11