NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 97% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 11.8 billion / sec versus 6.0 billion / sec
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 284.16 gflops versus 192 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 900 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 573 versus 397
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 versus 89
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2351 versus 1583
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.651 versus 4.329
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 213.211 versus 162.162
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.624 versus 0.426
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.978 versus 12.306
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1056 versus 737
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 1731
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1056 versus 737
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 1731
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 versus 3 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec versus 6.0 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops versus 192 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 573 versus 397 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 versus 89 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2351 versus 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 versus 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 versus 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 versus 0.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 versus 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1056 versus 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1056 versus 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 1731 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 740 MHz
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 versus 1352
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 versus 1352
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 740 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 versus 1352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 versus 1352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 573 | 397 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 89 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2351 | 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 | 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 | 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 | 0.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.521 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 | 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1056 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1352 | 2906 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1056 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1352 | 2906 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1508 | 1509 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 740 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 284.16 gflops | 192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.8 billion / sec | 6.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 23 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |