NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 1090 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 846.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,862 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 55
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 versus 8 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 1090 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 55 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 66.08 GTexel / s versus 58.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 3.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 17466
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 versus 799.414
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 versus 4.536
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 30.523
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 223.683
- 14.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1730 versus 122
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s versus 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 versus 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 223.683 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 versus 122 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | 65217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 4.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 76.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 237.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 | 1730 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 | 8 August 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $86 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 586 | 673 |
| Prix maintenant | $124.99 | $179.50 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | 26.72 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz | 1090 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops | 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.2 GTexel / s | 66.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
