NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 187.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 versus 150.951
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1844.67 versus 1718.593
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 versus 28.289
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3691
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3340
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3691
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3340
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 10 June 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 versus 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 versus 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 versus 28.289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1024
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13507 versus 7568
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 389
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 44918 versus 41946
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 versus 10.683
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 versus 644.054
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 12180
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 12180
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6066 versus 3666
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 versus 7568 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 389 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44918 versus 41946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 versus 10.683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 versus 644.054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 12180 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 versus 3666 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7568 | 13507 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 851 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41946 | 44918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3666 | 6066 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 10 June 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 273 | 278 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | |
| Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
