NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus AMD FirePro W4300
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro W4300 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8626 versus 2818
- 5.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 versus 10312
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 31.528
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 828.57
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 2.985
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 versus 59.153
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 versus 152.484
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 3572
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 3572
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 1 December 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 versus 2818 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 versus 10312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 31.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 828.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 2.985 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 59.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 versus 152.484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 3572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 3572 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W4300
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 364
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 versus 3718
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 versus 3358
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 versus 3718
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 versus 3358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6161 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17597 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6161 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17597 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 2818 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 10312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 31.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 828.57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 2.985 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 59.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 152.484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 3572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 6161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 17597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 3572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 6161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 17597 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD FirePro W4300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 1 December 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 416 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 2,080 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,428 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 171 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
