NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 24x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 16
- 24.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- 5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 347
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 194
- 8.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 versus 538
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 8.712
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 155.638
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.931
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 7.36
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.499 versus 12.009
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 754
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1492
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 2392
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 754
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1492
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 16 |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 versus 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 versus 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 versus 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 versus 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 42% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 64 Watt
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 2392 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1003 | 1501 |
| Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,200 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
