NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 8.1x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 24.2x better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 347
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 194
- 8.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 538
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 8.712
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 155.638
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.931
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 7.36
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.499 vs 12.009
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 754
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1492
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2392
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 754
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1492
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2392
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 vs 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 vs 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 vs 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 vs 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 vs 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2392 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 64 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | GK106 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 1003 | 1501 |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
Quick Sync |