NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 824 MHz
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1435
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 3300
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1435
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 3300
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 22 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 824 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3300 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.55 GTexel / s versus 33.9 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 949.2 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- 800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1883 versus 1749
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 versus 368
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5202 versus 4493
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.806 versus 12.582
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 versus 364.463
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.535 versus 1.254
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 versus 18.386
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.664 versus 23.499
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 versus 3478
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 versus 3478
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s versus 33.9 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1883 versus 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 versus 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5202 versus 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 versus 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 versus 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 versus 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 versus 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 versus 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 versus 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 versus 3478 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 1883 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 428 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 5202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 13.806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 546.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 1.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 27.524 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 38.664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3531 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3531 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3300 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 22 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1003 | 968 |
| Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 949.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 39.55 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 147 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
