NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 824 MHz
• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1435
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3300
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1435
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3300

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1883 vs 1749
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 368
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5202 vs 4493
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.806 vs 12.582
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 vs 364.463
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.535 vs 1.254
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 vs 18.386
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.664 vs 23.499
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 3478
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 3478

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 1883
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	368 428
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4493 5202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.582 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.463 546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.254 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.386 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.499 38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3300

Compare specifications (specs)