NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 30.4 GTexel / s versus 6.0 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 729.6 gflops versus 192 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 6.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 800 MHz
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.245 versus 4.329
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 versus 162.162
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.785 versus 0.426
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 versus 12.306
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 versus 737
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 versus 1731
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 versus 2906
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 3 September 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s versus 6.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops versus 192 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 versus 4.329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 versus 162.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 versus 0.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 versus 12.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 versus 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 versus 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 versus 2906 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 950 MHz
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 23.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 737 versus 31.3
- 39.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 versus 43.4
- 31.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 versus 91.5
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 950 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 737 versus 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 versus 43.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 versus 91.5 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 | 4.329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 | 162.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 | 0.426 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 | 12.306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 | 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 | 2906 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31.3 | 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 43.4 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 91.5 | 2906 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 394 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 3 September 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1507 | 1510 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s | 6.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | (G)DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400M G
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 420M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
