NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 89.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,867 gflops
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 195 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 versus 1914
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 31 January 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 89.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,867 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 versus 1914 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1536
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2048 MB
- 4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 18376
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 46.086
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 989.685
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 4.645
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 versus 36.463
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 99.577
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3666
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3306
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3666
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 versus 1536 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2048 MB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 versus 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3306 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18376 | 82144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | 63.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 | 1177.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 | 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | 69.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | 343.81 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 31 January 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $449 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 544 | 503 |
Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1058 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | 267 mm |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2048 MB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256-bit GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |