NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 109 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 83.2x plus de pipelines: 1664 versus 20
- 78.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,920 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 15.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 630
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 314
- 8.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 versus 3210
- 11.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 8.844
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 versus 171.17
- 7.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 versus 1.115
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 versus 10.385
- 39.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 versus 12.361
- 11.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 2808
- 11.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 2808
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 369 versus 194
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 148 Watt
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 148 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GM204 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 371 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | 400 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1664 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Quick Sync |