NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 versus 7539
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 497 versus 380
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 versus 41907
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 152.235
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 versus 1843.045
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 versus 10.681
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 115.607
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 12180
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 12180
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 2 Apr 2020 |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 versus 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 versus 41907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 versus 1843.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 versus 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 115.607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 12180 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Environ 84% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1485 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 versus 599.217
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3358
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3358
- 7.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 469
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 versus 599.217 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 469 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 41907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 1843.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 115.607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 644.098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 8062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 8062 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 3656 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA106 | TU117 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 267 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 4700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
