NVIDIA NVS 5200M versus Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 5200M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA NVS 5200M

versus

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 5200M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 650 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 10.75 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
6x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 16
7.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.0 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 45 Watt
Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 versus 347
4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2130 versus 538
Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 versus 155.638
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 versus 7.36
Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.851 versus 12.009
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 versus 2392
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	17 September 2012 versus 14 May 2012
Vitesse du noyau	672 MHz versus 650 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	10.75 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	96 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	258.0 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	507 versus 347
Geekbench - OpenCL	2130 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	189.966 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.643 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.851 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2715 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2715 versus 2392

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 versus 188
Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 5.829
Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.539
3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 versus 222
Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 versus 1099
3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 versus 222
Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 1099

Caractéristiques
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 40 nm
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	194 versus 188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.712 versus 5.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.931 versus 0.539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	754 versus 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492 versus 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	754 versus 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492 versus 1099

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

507

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

188

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2130

538

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.829

8.712

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

189.966

155.638

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.539

0.931

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.643

7.36

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.851

12.009

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

222

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1099

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2715

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

222

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1099

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2715

2392

Nom	NVIDIA NVS 5200M	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	507	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	188	194
Geekbench - OpenCL	2130	538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.829	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	189.966	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.539	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	9.643	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.851	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	222	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1099	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2715	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	222	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1099	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2715	2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA NVS 5200M	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Fermi	Generation 7.0
Nom de code	GF108	Ivy Bridge GT2
Date de sortie	17 September 2012	14 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1513	1501
Genre	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	672 MHz	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	258.0 gflops	33.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	96	16
Taux de remplissage de la texture	10.75 GTexel / s	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	585 million	1,200 million
Vitesse augmenté		1050 MHz
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM	PCIe 1.0 x16
Taille du laptop	medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	25.12 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	3140 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	1
Technologies
Quick Sync