NVIDIA Quadro K4200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 87.81 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 384
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,107 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4340 versus 2220
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 versus 480
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 versus 6869
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.016 versus 22.112
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 versus 297.631
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.73 versus 1.427
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 versus 15.363
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 2970
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 versus 2490
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 2970
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 versus 2490
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,107 gflops versus 863.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4340 versus 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 versus 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 versus 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 versus 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 versus 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 versus 15.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 versus 2490 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 784 MHz
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 108 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 versus 70.194
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 3311
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 3311
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 784 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 108 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 versus 70.194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 3311 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4340 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GK104 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $854.99 | $189.89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 681 | 953 |
Prix maintenant | $446.99 | $189.93 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.92 | 15.23 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 784 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,107 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 160 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 172.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |