NVIDIA Quadro K620 versus AMD FirePro W5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD FirePro W5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 930 MHz
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 50 Watt
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 31 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 930 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 44.64 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 65% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,428 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2978 versus 2220
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 versus 480
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 versus 6869
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 versus 22.112
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 versus 297.631
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 versus 1.427
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 versus 15.363
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 versus 99.125
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 versus 2970
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 2490
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3329
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 versus 2970
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 2490
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3329
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.64 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,428 gflops versus 863.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2978 versus 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 versus 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11724 versus 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.15 versus 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 versus 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.199 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 versus 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.258 versus 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4397 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4397 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3329 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM107 | Bonaire |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 31 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 953 | 627 |
Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 930 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 4x DisplayPort |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | 171 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |