NVIDIA Quadro K620 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K620

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 954 MHz
Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 732.7 gflops
Environ 24% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 51 Watt
Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2233 versus 1577
Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 versus 382
Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 versus 4071
Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 versus 14.332
Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 versus 265.424
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 versus 1.093
Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 versus 15.009
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 versus 38.219
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 2446
Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 versus 1631
Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 1974
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 2446
Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 versus 1631
Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 1974

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 July 2014 versus 1 March 2013
Vitesse du noyau	1058 MHz versus 954 MHz
Performance á point flottant	863.2 gflops versus 732.7 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt versus 51 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2233 versus 1577
PassMark - G2D Mark	472 versus 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869 versus 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112 versus 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631 versus 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427 versus 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363 versus 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125 versus 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970 versus 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490 versus 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 versus 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970 versus 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490 versus 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 versus 1974

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Environ 70% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.53 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz

Taux de remplissage de la texture	30.53 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
Vitesse de mémoire	4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2233

1577

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

472

382

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6869

4071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.112

14.332

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

297.631

265.424

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.427

1.093

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.363

15.009

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

99.125

38.219

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2970

2446

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2490

1631

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

1974

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2970

2446

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2490

1631

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

1974

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K620	NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	2233	1577
PassMark - G2D Mark	472	382
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869	4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112	14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631	265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427	1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363	15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125	38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970	2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490	1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970	2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490	1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	1974
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	702	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K620	NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Nom de code	GM107	GK107
Date de sortie	22 July 2014	1 March 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$189.89	$599
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	974	1206
Prix maintenant	$189.93	$164.99
Genre	Workstation	Workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	15.23	11.74
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1124 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1058 MHz	954 MHz
Performance á point flottant	863.2 gflops	732.7 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	17.98 GTexel / s	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt	51 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,870 million	1,270 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Nombre d’écrans á la fois	4
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	160 mm	202 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Largeur	1" (2.5 cm)
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz	4000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	128 Bit	GDDR5
Bande passante de la mémoire		64 GB / s
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management