NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 95% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 215 Watt
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 15% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2560
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10966 versus 7438
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 550
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18813 versus 12640
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 19529
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 19529
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3715
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3715
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3356
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3356
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 2560 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 versus 7438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 550 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18813 versus 12640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 10966 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 550 | 912 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12640 | 18813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6293 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 171 | 97 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |