NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 und NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 25% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Etwa 17% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 1914.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 1792
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 11545
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 795
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 42289
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 152.325
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1590.392
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 11.365
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 45.977
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 751.626
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 15267
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3714
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3358
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 15267
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3714
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3358
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1115
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 vs 6 February 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 1792 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 11545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 795 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 1115 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 2.2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 100 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 4.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7604 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7604 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 11545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 795 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1115 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 6 February 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $815 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 287 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Jetzt kaufen | $799.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5,304 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 241 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7604 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |