NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1202 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 1914.4x more texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 1792
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 11545
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 795
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 42289
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 152.325
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 1590.392
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 11.365
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 45.977
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 751.626
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 15267
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3714
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3358
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 15267
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3714
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3358
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1115

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 220 Watt
• 4.3x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22253 11545
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 795
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	123479 42289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	453.922 152.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5803.174 1590.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.757 11.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.055 45.977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1664.554 751.626
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3163 1115

Compare specifications (specs)