NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1202 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 1792
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 11545
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 795
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 42289
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 152.325
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 1590.392
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 11.365
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 45.977
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 751.626
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 15267
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3714
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3358
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 15267
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3714
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3358
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 1115
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 6 February 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1202 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 1792 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 11545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 795 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 1115 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 220 Watt
- 4.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 | 11545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 795 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 | 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 | 1115 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 6 February 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $815 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 44 | 287 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $799.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7604 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |