AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 600 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 382
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 18.251
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.268 vs 1.9
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 36.241
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 62.895
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3383
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3383

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 88% higher pipelines: 960 vs 512
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 1833
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10780 vs 10229
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 vs 438.581
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3241
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3241

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2745
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	401 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10229 10780
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.848 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	438.581 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.268 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.988 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.235 62.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3334

Compare specifications (specs)