AMD Radeon Pro Duo versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Duo and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 163.7 GTexel / s
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 2816
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 8,192 gflops versus 5,238 gflops
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 350 Watt versus 750 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8183 versus 7580
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 versus 747
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 56152 versus 43046
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 141.474 versus 106.585
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 versus 1878.403
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.132 versus 9.751
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 versus 82.208
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 versus 511.115
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10141 versus 9143
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 32085
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10141 versus 9143
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 32085
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 April 2016 versus 26 March 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 2816 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops versus 5,238 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8183 versus 7580 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 versus 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56152 versus 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 versus 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 versus 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 versus 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 versus 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 32085 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 10x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3713
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3713
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3713 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8183 | 7580 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 | 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56152 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Duo | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Capsaicin | Hawaii |
| Conception | reference | |
| Date de sortie | 26 April 2016 | 26 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 201 |
| Prix maintenant | $849 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 128 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | 5,238 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 | 2816 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 8,900 million | 6,200 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 277 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 3x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 4096 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Duo avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDFirePro W9100
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro Duo vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
