AMD Radeon R7 360 vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3138 vs 516
- 15.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 vs 1071
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2461
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 14 May 2012 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3138 vs 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 516
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 516 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 360 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3138 | 516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 | 1071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2461 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 360 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Tobago | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 14 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 627 | 616 |
Price now | $146.65 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,200 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.1 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |