AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 735 MHz
• 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• 3.4x more texture fill rate: 279.0 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15097 vs 10117
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 497
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73020 vs 57885
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 260.061 vs 229.393
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5472.868 vs 2082.931
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.421 vs 16.561
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 vs 134.68
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.228 vs 599.217
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19713 vs 16098
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 26778 vs 3717
• 20.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 69225 vs 3358
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19713 vs 16098
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 26778 vs 3717
• 20.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 69225 vs 3358
• 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1492 vs 469

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
• Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 132 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15097 10117
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 497
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	73020 57885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	260.061 229.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5472.868 2082.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.421 16.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.312 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1152.228 599.217
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19713 16098
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26778 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69225 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19713 16098
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26778 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69225 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1492 469

Compare specifications (specs)