NVIDIA GRID K2 vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K2 and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 15.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• 6.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 480
• 6x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 990
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 319 vs 312
• 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 vs 1928
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 vs 6.303
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 392.237
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 vs 0.597
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 vs 17.874
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 vs 72.818
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 1747
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 344
• 24.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 312
• 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 344
• 24.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2737 990
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10550 1928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.948 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	968.568 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.58 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.988 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	114.144 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6371 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	344 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 7745

Compare specifications (specs)