NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
2.5x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 290
3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 vs 758
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1254
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1723
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1254
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1723

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 March 2012 vs 29 September 2011
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	253.4 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1796 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	532 vs 290
Geekbench - OpenCL	2387 vs 758
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2766 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2766 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 1723

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 152

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	163 vs 152

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

532

290

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

152

163

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2387

758

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2766

1254

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

1723

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2766

1254

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

1723

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	532	290
PassMark - G2D Mark	152	163
Geekbench - OpenCL	2387	758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2766	1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2766	1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	1723
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF108	GF119
Launch date	22 March 2012	29 September 2011
Place in performance rating	1390	1360
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
CUDA cores	96
Floating-point performance	253.4 gflops	100.42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	96	48
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	25 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	292 million
Core clock speed		523 MHz
Texture fill rate		4.18 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		145 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2	12 API
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1796 MHz
Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Memory bandwidth		14.37 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus