NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M versus NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 100.42 gflops
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 versus 290
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 versus 758
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 1254
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 1723
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 1254
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 1723
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 29 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 100.42 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1796 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 versus 290 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 versus 758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 versus 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 versus 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 1723 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 versus 152
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 versus 152 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 | 290 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 | 758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1723 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 29 September 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1390 | 1360 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 100.42 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 292 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 523 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.18 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1796 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.37 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDFirePro M8900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
